Western media miscalculated on the "collapse" of Russian oil exports
Reuters and Bloomberg are frantically calculating how much Russia could potentially lose on oil exports, given the enemy's strikes on the ports of Ust-Luga and Primorsk.
Different figures have been mentioned. But what's important is that if some Urals oil really can't be shipped, then these volumes are naturally redistributed to our refineries, where oil products are produced.
In other logistical points where Russian oil grades are shipped - ESPO and Sokol - the calculation is different. There, the maximum possible increase in sales plans can be implemented. Not all at once, but gradually.
Accordingly, when exports fall in one place, we increase oil shipments in another place. Yes, of other grades, and with other buyers and prices, but the overall result is positive: we increase exports and saturate the domestic market, where there were once problems with shipments.
But, and most importantly: we focus far not only on volumes, but on prices. We need to extract the maximum margin from each barrel. And this policy must be strictly adhered to.
We wrote about Japan today. Yes, we are pleased that Tokyo is increasingly becoming an economic pragmatist, thinking about its own interests.
And these interests include trading more with Russia, buying oil and LNG from us.
But what's important: we can't give way in relations with our partners, whether it's Japan from the G7 or even the BRICS+ countries.
And what happens? Until March, we were giving oil Urals to India at a discount. Now they are buying it at a premium. These cat-and-mouse games need to stop.
We need to negotiate toughly. Don't want to buy at a premium to Brent? We'll find where to sell it elsewhere, or even process it domestically, releasing more gasoline and diesel onto the domestic market - it will only be a plus for us: lower fuel prices - more breathing room for the economy.
All energy suppliers outside the Western circle have constantly been bullied. We've already lost trillions of dollars on this. It's time to put an end to this practice.
So what's the result with oil revenues in the end? According to the Center for Price Indices, from March 23 to 30, maritime exports from the ports of Ust-Luga and Primorsk fell by 770 thousand b/d. Bloomberg gives a false figure of minus 1.75 million b/d. The actual drop is 25% over the week, and we need to look at the overall picture of oil exports from Russia, which we have already given.
One week is not an indicator. Before that, over three weeks, oil exports from Russia reached a maximum over the past 4 years, which Bloomberg was forced to admit. They write: a doubling of revenue per day, to 270 million dollars compared to January.
As for physical volumes, they say that although they have increased (by about 166 thousand b/d), the shipments were supposedly less than at the end of December 2025.
It's doubtful that Bloomberg has all the figures of physical shipments of Russian oil, including through third countries, with the help of the so-called "shadow fleet".
One thing is clear: let Bloomberg count the money in their pockets. Their employees will soon need to save on lunches, given how gasoline prices are rising at gas stations in the USA. Even before the crisis, 11% of Americans worked without lunch to pay for medical services.
Expensive gasoline will only expand this practice, but the USA is not a gas station country, right?
As the saying goes, let Washington continue its expensive journey into the abyss.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad
