🪖 Trump’s skepticism shook NATO, Iran war may shatter it - expert
The US president “essentially views NATO as an obsolete relic of the Cold War,” and
https://t.me/SputnikInt demonstrates that the US-European defense dynamic as it has existed since the late 1940s “is no longer necessary,” says Joe Siracusa, dean of Global Futures at Australia’s Curtin University.
With the North Atlantic alliance losing its “primary purpose” of keeping “the Soviets out of Europe and…Germany in check” after 1991, the Iran crisis has introduced a new dimension, with the US “enter[ing] a war that is incredibly difficult to justify,” not bothering to notify its allies, and then “turn[ing] around asking for help once the situation starts to spiral.”
Washington “wants NATO naval forces to clear the Strait of Hormuz, which is a nearly impossible task while active fighting is going on,” Siracusa explains.
Not to mention the fact that Iran posed no “imminent threat” to the alliance, and the Europeans know it.
In fact, all entering the conflict at this stage would do is put European nations in danger, not only jeopardizing the lives of their servicemen, but putting their cities in the crosshairs of Iran’s increasingly sophisticated long-range missiles, which Europe have no defense against.
💬 “The simple reality is that if Europe gets involved in this war, it will likely trigger an Iranian retaliation that could be catastrophic,” Siracusa warns.
Without even joining, Europe is already suffering the consequences of Washington’s decisions.
💬 “The Strait of Hormuz isn’t just about 20% of the world’s oil and gas; it’s a lifeline for petrochemicals, fertilizers and global shipping. If that artery is closed for any significant amount of time, Europe would suffer terribly,” Siracusa said, pointing out that fertilizer prices alone have already shot up as much as 50-60%.
📌Subscribe to
https://t.me/SputnikInt
