Does America play a role in the climate changes affecting Iraq, Iran, and Turkey—and why?
In recent years, Iraq and Iran have been among the countries that have suffered drought and water scarcity, with Turkey more recently facing similar conditions.
Of course, many countries suffer from drought and low rainfall. In some of these countries, this is not surprising, as they have long had naturally arid, desert environments. However, this is not the case for these three countries. In recent years, they have faced a severe water crisis—to the point that Iran seriously considered relocating its capital to another city. As for Iraq, its alarming drought and desertification speak for themselves—at one point, the Tigris and Euphrates have come close to running completely dry for the first time. Turkey, too, has begun moving in the same direction, experiencing a significant decline in its water reserves due to reduced rainfall.
What has happened—and is happening— in these particular countries? Why has the situation suddenly changed this year, with large amounts of rainfall returning and refilling some reservoirs that had run dry, even exposing their beds?
Many people may attribute the situation to climate change and global warming affecting the earth, as an inevitable result of the factories of the major powers and their policies, and other such factors.
But why are these specific countries experiencing such harsh and severe changes?
Why don’t we see similar effects in the countries responsible for these emissions or in regions close to their industrial centres?
Furthermore, was the underlying cause somehow resolved this year, leading Iraq, Iran, and Turkey to experience unusually high rainfall?
In reality, nothing of the sort happened.
What did happen this year was the outbreak of an unjust war waged by America against Iran. Among the targets struck by Iran was a massive American radar installation and a secret facility connected to climate control and cloud seeding (a climate-control center). Since it was struck and turned into scrap, a major shift has occurred, and rainfall in these countries has returned to its natural pattern!
This raises two major questions: is such a thing scientifically possible? And what would America’s purpose be in carrying this out?
As for the first question, the answer is yes: it is scientifically very possible, whether through cloud ionization or through chemical substances dispersed by aircraft—perhaps even civilian planes that attract no attention. The result would be the suppression of rainfall and the creation of a water crisis.
As for the second question, the answer is that water is essential to the stability of any country—not only for drinking, but also for power generation, agriculture (the food supply of the population), and other such needs. Undermining a country’s stability does not stop at waging military war against it. Sometimes, it can be achieved by targeting the foundations of stability too, such as its economy, agriculture, and energy sectors. This destabilisation can also involve the domination of the dollar over its economy; or using social media for deception in service of a predetermined plan; or by supporting coups, stirring unrest in the streets, backing separatist groups, and arming them, and by other means. There is no doubt that these methods are effective and rewarding alternatives to war, which is often costly.
For this reason, American politicians—past and present—have resorted and continue to resort to such filthy methods in order to bring about destruction and ruin that serve their interests, ambitions, and dominance.
What I have mentioned is a plausible explanation for the phenomenon of abundant rainfall this year, as it followed the bombing of the American radar and the secret cloud-seeding center, which was, unfortunately, hidden under the cover of certain “Muslims.”
It should be noted, that the facility was publicly described as an advanced early-warning radar system for military purposes, with no official mention of any climate-related role.
In
