An elaboration of young Odin from
How can information be verified?
Regarding yesterday's text from fuf media ("Important: 1. There is ZERO insider information that [is not] publicly verifiable - NO INFORMATION goes OUTSIDE...")
▶️ My opinion on this: In reality, there is no way to "publicly" check anything. Not even if you were standing right next to it, as there are deceptions (e.g. holographic techniques, etc.) that you cannot recognize as such.
▶️ "Public" media plays even less of a role in verifying information, except perhaps in the sense that one can usually assume the exact opposite of what is said there.
▶️ There is nothing left but to observe the scene attentively and flexibly for years and put the puzzle pieces together yourself. This is why everyone has a more or less strong difference in their conception from everyone else. There are no two views exactly the same.
▶️ I've spent a lot of time verifying statements and at first thought it depended on the "reliability" of the sources. But that doesn't work because, firstly, there is no such thing as ultimate "reliability" and secondly, it is always evaluated subjectively. Everyone tends to consider those sources to be more reliable that reflect their own opinion, are well formulated and perhaps include a little additional information that was previously unknown to them.
▶️ So far so good, but we also know that for the vast majority of people this is precisely the deep state media, which does not primarily serve to provide information, but rather to manage, indoctrinate and disinform the people. Others recognize this with ease, but are often approached by various seemingly spiritual or esoteric or other media tendencies to revolve around it - as has happened to me.
▶️ So why do we think that things would be different for us in particular as long as we don't courageously and confidently gradually form our own views from all the different statements around the world?
▶️ And of course a lot of top secret information leaks out, if not all of it! The only difference is that the sources are kept secret or are unlikely, little known or unknown. However, for the reasons mentioned above, this makes little difference, since only everyone can "verify" it themselves - and only for themselves.
▶️ In addition, the above-mentioned reasons show that it is pointless to argue about "truth" because this causes nothing more than unnecessary divisions, since "truth" (at least on our current level) must remain individual and cannot be absolute .
What we called “Truth” is always just one of an infinite number of possible (& constantly changing in phases, years, epochs and eras) descriptions of processes and states. What real meaning could the term “Truth” have for us today? - Here is one option for disposition:
🌿 Truth is the Unity among the Peoples and the Nature, which finds expression in mutual appreciation, reverence, mindfulness and support. Untruth is everything that thwarts this Unity.
https://t.me/Zuerst_Deutschland
