Dr Mike Yeadon

Public

View Channel

18.5K

267

2.3M

Can't Join? @DrMikeYeadon

28.3k Members

Updated: May 26, 2026 at 12:38 PM

Dr Mike Yeadon

The only former pharma company research exec telling truth about covid lies. Highly qualified in respiratory, immunology, all areas of new drug R&D.

@DrMikeYeadon offers specialized information about pharma and exec for subscribers interested in Breaking News

Ranking

Global Ranking

#25567

-2378

Language Ranking

#3461

-90

Category Ranking

#465

-52

Participant Growth (Last 20 Days)

Total: 28.3K

24h growth: +0 0%

Latest Posts

Dr Mike Yeadon

Mar 19, 2026, 02:02 AM

📷 Photo

I think, if there’s room to do it, that this post ought to be pinned in this channel.

It may prove to be among the most important words said in an officially recognised court in recent times.

https://www.josephsansone.com/p/english-translation-of-attorney-peter

Best wishes
Mike

👉

1,290

Dr Mike Yeadon

Mar 19, 2026, 02:02 AM

Peter knows perfectly well that “the preferred reality” (a phrase used by a senior NATO officer to describe the objectives of member states at the beginning of the convid psyop) includes numerous things which themselves are psyops.
We must use their descriptions at some points in the proceedings to illustrate that their intentions were always malign.
For example, my testimony adopts the working assumption they did what they said they were doing in relation to design of the jabs.
There’s no escaping that, according to the teaching in which I was immersed for most of my professional life, axiomatically this will result in harm and every person with similar training to mind knows that.
For example, that your body attacks non self is Immunology textbook 101.
Organ transplant problems perfectly illustrate that reality of such a thing, as do several chronic illnesses involving self attack, often called autoimmune disorders.
Even the lay audience cannot fail to grasp the magnitude of the intentional horror of what I will communicate to them.

And there’s more, every one of them unmistakably harmful and obviously so, each equally well known things, all of which the education on how to go about new drug discovery and development “teaches away from”. That is, you go out of your way NOT to permit ANY of these features in your new medical entity.

They did it on purpose, with unquestionably guilty minds.

...

The meat of one part of my testimony in the Netherlands trial.

👉

1,200

Dr Mike Yeadon

Mar 19, 2026, 02:02 AM

🎥 Video

Btw, if you’re into holistic home remedies, snag this book. It’s such a great resource to have around!

Barbara O’Neill is our favorite in this house. This sustain me book is a wealth of knowledge about the body.🌿

Explore Barbara O’Neill's Health Insights in Her Book💚

Discover valuable knowledge about health and the body from Barbara O’Neill's book.

This is not just a book.
It’s knowledge that could change the way you live forever.
👇👇👇👇👇

1. Sustain Me by Barbara O'Neill👇
https://shortll.com/SustainMe
https://shortll.com/SustainMe

2. Barbara O'Neill by Self Heal By Design👇
https://shortll.com/Self-Heal
https://shortll.com/Self-Heal

1,620

Dr Mike Yeadon

Mar 19, 2026, 02:02 AM

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth_Summit

I stumbled on this entry while learning about Nelson’s Column in London.

I find the Earth Summit, aka “Rio 1992”, absolutely chilling, now that I have an understanding of its origins and purposes, which I lacked entirely at the time.

Lots to dislike in this, notably the signing on to commitments made by most of the nations of the world, under the rather tame description of the United Nations Agenda 21.

I doubt that many delegates understood what was at stake, but there will have been some who knew perfectly well that they were “selling their country down the river”, that is, transferring their sovereignty to a group that I call The Useless Eliters.

To this day, you could show this entry, about the 1992 Rio Earth Summit, to large numbers of people to the following reactions. Most people won’t even have heard about it. Others will remember that they have heard of it, but wouldn’t have the foggiest idea what it was about beyond, perhaps, a commitment to “do something” about “global warming” (later amended to
“climate change”).

Unfortunately, there’s a lot of obviously malevolent objectives in Agenda 21, to which nefarious details were added in the 20-teens in the form of the UN2030 Sustainable Development Goals.

Best wishes
Mike

👉

1,540

Dr Mike Yeadon

Mar 19, 2026, 02:02 AM

https://youtu.be/cT5VBfjx9MI

Here is a dubbed in English version of the appeal hearing in Amsterdam last Monday, March 9th 2026, at which attorney Peter Stassen lays out his reasons why the expert witnesses should be heard in court in the main proceedings scheduled (I think) for October of this year.

Please remember that the appeal is a purely procedural matter. It’s not about the culpability or otherwise of the defendants.

Also, a reminder of why the attorney chose to bring a civil suit against multiple individuals and not, for example, make allegations of criminal conduct & against corporations.

The Netherlands, unusually, allows tort (civil liability) cases to be brought against individuals. If found guilty, the court can award financial compensation to the plaintiffs. This is about establishing what has happened, not about jailing, for example, the guilty parties. The most propitious part to that objective is what has been selected.

Our testimony is definitely going to feature in the substantive proceedings. Evidence has been filed and accepted by the court already, in writing and on video. The only question is whether we are to be permitted to give that evidence in person in the court and to face cross examination by the defence. This is obviously what we want to be able to do.

Imagine if such proceedings were to be recorded or even live-streamed? I understand it is a public process in that there were people in the public gallery. At one point, we hear them laugh, loudly, when the counsel for one of the defendants rather limply reaffirmed that “The vaccines were safe and effective”. The judge crossly reproved them, suggesting they be quiet or to go and laugh elsewhere, which is priceless.

Best wishes
Mike

👉

Dr Mike Yeadon

Mar 19, 2026, 02:02 AM

Devil's advocate question: What if the premise is not Controlling Thoughts, but generating or steering emotionality. Parts of the brain are associated with different emotional states. As in - what if they are hyper-activating the amygdala to induce an ongoing state of fear?
Is that possible to target a specific brain area, inducing specific emotionality?

...

I think that’s possible but you can easily defend against the possibility. Don’t let anyone open up your skull and implant some electrodes into your pink matter!

👉

1,290

Dr Mike Yeadon

Mar 19, 2026, 02:02 AM

https://drmikeyeadon.substack.com/p/elephant-avoidance-cui-bono-everybody

My thanks to Tim for weaving together our different and convergent thoughts about how to begin loosening the psychological bonds laid upon us.

Best wishes
Mike

👉

1,400

Dr Mike Yeadon

Mar 19, 2026, 02:02 AM

https://youtu.be/N02SK9yd60s

...

This man is a liar. It’s a well known speech.

👉

1,270

Dr Mike Yeadon

Mar 19, 2026, 02:02 AM

Hi Mike - Really interesting - tx. Further to yr comment, are all the poisoning mechanisms resulting from those sulphur compounds modelled through the observation of their effects, or are some of them directly observed pls?

...

All the toxicities mentioned have been directly observed.
As is always the case with toxicity, dose and duration tend to play important roles in the outcomes.

👉

1,240

Dr Mike Yeadon

Mar 19, 2026, 02:02 AM

https://youtu.be/V1sX1qkngSg

Thank you, CLP, for posting this simple yet very powerful video.

It’s seven minutes long. Turn the sound off if the music isn’t to your liking.

This ties in well with what has been called “The Hudson Conjecture”. Nick says:

“Anything claiming to be a worldwide crisis, which admits only top down solutions & brooks no dissent is a scam”.

I agree. Furthermore, “Yeadon’s rule of three” holds that:

“Anything told to us all by the authorities, which you cannot contest because the subject is too small, too far away or too complicated for almost anyone to be able properly to evaluate, is a lie”.

The perpetrators breach the Hudson Conjecture, utilise Yeadon’s rule of three to deceive us in order to persuade us to abandon ownership of ourselves, of our freedoms and of our possessions, because that’s the only way a tiny number of people have ever dominated the majority of the population.

Best wishes
Mike

👉

1,410

Showing 10 of 10 posts

No more posts

Loading posts...

Rating

User Reviews (0)

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your experience!

Loading reviews...

Related Telegram Channels

Anders Behring Breivik death sentence NOW - a person who killed at least 78 people in Norway living better than homeless

610

Intel Republic

107k0

Loading recommended channels...

Dr Mike Yeadon

Dr Mike Yeadon

Ranking

Participant Growth (Last 20 Days)

Latest Posts

Rating

User Reviews (0)

Related Telegram Channels

War Monitor

Our News, Today

𝕂𝕟𝕠𝕨𝕝𝕖𝕕𝕘𝕖 𝕒𝕟𝕕 𝔽𝕒𝕔𝕥𝕤

Calendar Signals

Newsmakers

Boinkers News

Anders Behring Breivik death sentence NOW - a person who killed at least 78 people in Norway living better than homeless

Intel Republic

Related Telegram Channels

War Monitor

Our News, Today

𝕂𝕟𝕠𝕨𝕝𝕖𝕕𝕘𝕖 𝕒𝕟𝕕 𝔽𝕒𝕔𝕥𝕤

Calendar Signals

Newsmakers

Boinkers News

Anders Behring Breivik death sentence NOW - a person who killed at least 78 people in Norway living better than homeless

Intel Republic

User Reviews (0)

Latest Posts